|
February 17,
2000, is the 400th anniversary of one of the most infamous
intellectual and spiritual crimes of all time: the public burning at
the stake, in Rome, of the great radical thinker and theologian
Giordano Bruno.
Julia Jones, a Harvard-educated, Los Angeles-based screenwriter and
documentary film producer, traveled to Rome to be present at
commemorative ceremonies at the Campo de Fiori marking the death of
Bruno, and to film a documentary memorializing celebrations honoring
this fiercely courageous man whose depth of visionary genius is only
just now beginning to be recognized.
In the article that follows, Julia--who has written a screenplay on
the life of Bruno--tells Journal of Pan-Dimensional Literature
readers why it is not wrong to think of Bruno as a pan-dimensional
thinker centuries ahead of his time.
|
Against the backdrop of a 16th Century
Europe soaked in the blood of religious martyrs, renegade philosopher
Giordano Bruno cut a formidable swath, separating and dividing all
thinking men and women with his dangerous new ideas, fomenting change and
upheaval. The Renaissance equivalent of our 20th century revolutionary,
beatnik or hippie, Bruno was Buckminster Fuller with the attitude of Mick
Jagger, a man on the run from the Church and Rome, one of the most
notorious figures of his times who risked his life by preaching, in the
highest circles of Europe, a doctrine of brotherhood, peace and free love
at the same time that he alienated most of his contemporaries.
Bruno arrived in England in the year 1583,
an ex-Dominican friar and heretic seeking asylum and bearing a
"here-take-him" letter of introduction from the French king (who
had to get him out of France because his ideas on infinity and other
worlds had started near riots at the Sorbonne). Determined to enlighten
Oxford, Bruno wrote to the Vice-Chancellor, introducing himself and
announcing his services:
"Salutation from Philotheus
Jordanus Brunus of Nola, Doctor of a more scientific theology, professor
of a purer and less harmful learning, known in the chief universities of
Europe, a philosopher approved and honourably received, a stranger with
none but the uncivilised and ignoble, a wakener of sleeping minds, tamer
of presumptuous and obstinate ignorance... Brunus, whom only propagators
of folly and hypocrites detest, whom the honourable and studious love,
whom noble minds applaud..."
In less than three months he was driven
out. Paris, Oxford, London, Toulouse, Wittenberg, Geneva, Zurich, Rome,
Naples, Venice, Padua... Driven from town to town, excommunicated by
religions he'd never joined, sometimes disguised in his monk's robes, at
other times, even with royalty, wearing the plain brown kersey of the
common man replete with missing buttons, Bruno was never more than two
years in any one place. As a self-proclaimed "awakener of sleeping
souls" he placed his mission above everything else, including his
life and the good-will of his fellow men.
Who was this man? And what were these
'dangerous' ideas, obscured for a few short centuries yet so prevalent
today? And in the long run, is it man, or time, that decides what's
relevant in who and what we see and hear? The answer is time--and Bruno's
time is here. The world has at last caught up with him.
The cultural paradigm shift of the late
60's has left us with a new philosophy and a new science: a new awareness
of the essential unity of all--of the Divine All that is in everything. We
have a new reverence for nature. In quantum worlds, where everything is
connected to everything else, we see that reality is what we make or
create; we sense the interconnectedness of all life as we come at last to
experience the truth that what we do unto others, we do to ourselves too.
On some level, we know the deaths of butterflies can set off hurricanes;
that ridicule can turn to bullets and kill, like at Columbine; that the
All is in the All--and no one is safe from the effects of what they do or
think.
Giordano Bruno was the Man Who Saw Through
Time--prophet of these new age philosophies and The New Science. Four
hundred years ago, he wrote of morphogenic resonances--quantum mechanics,
chaos theory and the fractal nature of reality: As above, so below; of the
idea that all systems are connected and affect other systems; he knew,
intuitively, about the hundredth monkey, flowers morphing spontaneously in
fields all over the world; he gave us the perfect anti-Darwinian Divine
cause, that everything is connected, the fractal vision that everything is
in everything--not just that God is in all, but that ALL is in ALL.
And Bruno delivered his messianic vision of
an infinite universe grounded in science--a larger, more complicated,
profound, and accurate universe than the first telescope would ever reveal
to Galileo years later. At a time when science was separating from
religion, Bruno held them together--something neither science nor religion
would forgive him for. But now, four hundred years later, science reclaims
the Brunian path of intuition and sees in new ways.
Armed with today's popular awareness of the
All--of Bruno's essential unity underlying all things--scientists are
envisioning anti-worlds and multiple string universes, and, in the last
twenty-five years, are writing books with titles like: God and the New
Physics; The God Particle: If The Universe Is The Answer, What Is
The Question; The Mind of God: Science and the Search for New
Meaning; The Left Hand of Creation; Order Out of Chaos;
The Unfinished Universe...
But, four hundred years ago, when the world
and man sat snugly at the center of creation--a center defined by
boundaries and separation--Bruno's ideas of unity and infinity did more
than threaten religion and scholarship, they ripped the very underpinnings
out from under the social order. In essence, his teachings brought down
the hierarchies. In England, where he had his greatest triumph and left
his strongest mark, he became Marlowe's Faustus, then set the stage for a
long line of Shakespeare's fallen heroes: doubting Hamlets, 'kings of
infinite space', raging Lears--all leveled before the elements by one lone
man's vision of an All that said, "You do not come any nearer to
likeness, union and identity with the Infinite by being a man than by
being an ant, by being a star than by being a man; nor do you draw any
closer to that Being by being a sun or a moon, than by being a man or an
ant. For in the infinite, these things are indifferent."
What happened to Bruno? In 1591 he returned
to Italy where he was betrayed to the Venice Inquisition, arrested, and
acquitted, then turned over to Rome. He spent the next eight years in the
dungeons of the Holy Roman Inquisition while they tried to get him to
recant. On February 17, 1600, as part of the Jubilee festivities to
celebrate the new century, this destroyer of the hierarchies--deemed
heresiarch, a would-be leader of a new faith--became a sacrificial
offering to the new age; led to the stake amid the cheering throng, his
tongue spiked for silence, he was stripped, then burned alive. His ashes
were scattered to the winds of Rome; his books were burned and his name
erased, along with all true mention of him in textbooks of history,
science and literature.
Did Bruno seek his own death? Did he goad
the church into burning him? And is he still a problem for many today?
How would Bruno, who denounced virginity,
chastity and the Church's attitude towards abstinence as life-denying,
react to Clinton's indiscretions; what would he say to Jerry Falwell and
the religious right? How would Bruno, who claimed there was life on the
invisible worlds throughout an infinite universe, react to SETI and the
current belief in UFO's? How would Bruno, who condemned Columbus and the
explorers for "disturbing the spirits of native peoples" and
"...planting unheard-of follies where they did not before exist, so
that he who is strongest comes to conclude he is wisest," react to
colonial wars, to Vietnam?
What would Bruno, who spoke out against the
popular view of women as passive and base, have to say about a woman's
right to abortion and the use of contraception? How would he react to the
violence of our Columbines? What would he say? How much would he have to
say about nuclear weapons! Who is the Bruno of today who says:
"Awake, frail creatures, and cringe at your own insignificance"?
|
BRUNO SPEAKS:
Philosophical Writings
& Poetry
I believe and
understand that beyond and further beyond that imagined-border of
the sky, there will always be a further region and physical
worlds--stars, earths and suns--and that they are all absolutely
sensible, each according to their own laws and with respect to those
either on them or near them, although we cannot see them because of
their remoteness and great distance from us. But they are real...
Forth from the
womb of darkness,
free and passionate I dart.
I dread no barrier of banished spheres.
I cleave the sky, and other suns behold.
Celestial worlds innumerable I see:
one left, another company appears;
my opinions fail not and my heart is bold
to journey on through all infinity.
I, the Nolan [Bruno
was born in Nola, Italy], in order to free men's minds, seek to
unchain the human spirit and understanding from its stifling prison
room. Freed again, the human spirit and understanding will, as if
through peepholes, aim again at the far distant stars. The
authorities of Faith would cut off your wings so you cannot fly to
pierce the clouds of their illusions. This they would do because one
who can be free of their illusions, will be able to see what is
real.
The order and power
of light and darkness are not equal. For light is diffused and
penetrates to deepest darkness, but darkness does not reach to the
purest regions of light. Thus light comprehends darkness, overcomes
and conquers it throughout infinity...
You have then this
fact: that all things are in the universe and the universe is in all
things; we in it and it in us--and that therefore all things concur
in perfect unity. See how we should not afflict our spirit. See how
there is nothing that should alarm us. For this unity is sole and
stable, and remains for ever. This oneness is eternal. Every aspect,
every face, everything else is vanity, is as nothing--nay, all that
is outside of this One is nothing. Those philosophers who have found
unity have found their beloved Wisdom. Identical things indeed are
wisdom, truth, unity. All philosophers have been able to assert that
the true, the one and being are the same thing. But not all have
understood. Everything is one and the knowledge of this unity is the
purpose of all philosophies and natural contemplations. The man who
doesn't understand the one, understands nothing; the man who truly
understands the one, understands everything.
SPHERES
I reject the
possibility that the stars are fixed and pinned onto the tapestry of
the sky.
COPERNICUS
There is not a single
reason why the sun and the whole universe of stars should turn
around us any more than we should turn around them. Why would the
innumerable stars (which are so many worlds, some bigger than we
are) have such a violent reaction to us? Why would the pivots of the
universe totter, its axis mutate, the poles of the heavenly spheres
trepidate and, even if it were possible, the larger, more
magnificent globes toss, turn, twist, piece themselves together and,
spiting nature, dismember themselves so that we can, thus
perilously, attain the center? The infinite universe is one, a
single continuum, compound of ethereal regions and worlds.
Innumerable are the worlds, and they reside in diverse regions of
the single universe, and exist by the same law of nature as this
world inhabited by us is understood and indeed doth reside in her
own space and regions thereof. Thus is the excellence of God
magnified and the greatness of his kingdom made manifest; he is
glorified not in one, but in countless suns; not in a single earth,
a single world, but in a thousand, I say in an infinity of worlds.
SEED, CHYLE
Don't you see that
what was seed becomes stalk, what was stalk becomes corn, and what
was corn becomes bread--that out of bread comes chyle, out of chyle
blood, out of blood the seed, out of the seed the embryo... then
man, corpse, earth, stone, or something else in succession, and on
and on, involving all natural form. There must exist an unchanging
thing which is not stone nor earth nor corpse nor man nor embryo nor
blood nor anything else in particular, but which, after it was
blood, received the thing that was embryo and became embryo, and
after it was embryo, received the human being and became man.
|
|